September 22, 2015
Palm
Beach County Commissioners have unanimously voted to expand civil
rights protections for minorities by redefining "places of public
accommodation" in the Palm Beach County Ordinance for Equal Opportunity
to Housing and Places of Public Accommodation.
The vote, which passed in 6-0 decision, was held on Tuesday morning.
Specifically,
the amendment will now mean that it is prohibited to discriminate not
only in hotels or restaurants - which the original ordinance was
written for - but also in retail stores and other places of business
throughout the county.
For over forty years, Palm
Beach County has steadily strengthened civil rights ordinances that
prohibited discrimination. In 1973, the county passed an ordinance that
prohibits discrimination in hotels, motels, and restaurants. Over the
years those rights have expanded to include race, religion, national
origin, disability, marital status, age, sexual orientation and gender
identity or expression. However, those public accommodation
discrimination ordinances were limited to places offering lodging, food
service or entertainment.
"The ordinance traced its roots back to civil rights laws written in
the 1960s when it was legal to have 'Whites only' hotels, restaurants
and bars and the County Commissioners only addressed inequities had
occurred in very few places of commerce," explains Rand Hoch, President
and Founder of the Palm Beach County Human Rights Council. "As we know,
discriminatory acts are not limited to those few places."
Now, thanks to Tuesday's
vote, the County Commissioners have expanded the definition of public
accommodation to include retail stores, schools, day care and senior
centers, medical offices, funeral homes, bakeries, laundromats and
virtually all other places of business throughout the county.
Hoch,
and the Palm Beach County Human Rights Council, approached the County
Commission in January to address expanding the ordinance. The group's
objective was to prohibit consumer racism in retail stores, and to end
the so-called "shopping while black" practice, a phrase used to
describe racial profiling, or being denied service at a business because
the customer is black.
"The experience of people of
color being refused service - or given poor service - is not uncommon,"
the PBCHRC said in a statement. "'Shopping while Black' also includes
black customers being followed by store clerks, wrongly detained,
steered away from certain products, and being asked for additional
forms of identification regarding credit applications."
The
amendment also extends to those in the LGBT community who may face
discrimination from businesses refusing service over sexual
orientation.
The legalization of same-sex marriage
throughout several states recently has also brought upon examples of
discrimination, where places like locally-owned bakeries and wedding
shops have refused to provide services for gay and lesbian couples looking to get married.
Hoch
explains that, under the new ordinance, a bakery that refuses a gay or
lesbian couple service may be subject with not only litigation, but a
fine of up to $50,000.
No comments:
Post a Comment